Top 5 Reasons Why YOU Should Vote or Not Vote

Examining Donald J. Trump’s appeal and challenges as a leader reveals five main elements that can help voters weigh his strengths and weaknesses. Here’s a breakdown of what makes him a compelling candidate for some—and a divisive one for others:

1. Bold, Fast-Paced Decision-Maker with Skin in the Game

One of Trump’s defining characteristics is his boldness and ability to make swift decisions, especially on economic and business issues. Having a background in real estate, hospitality, and branding, he is often seen as someone who brings a unique, investor-like mindset to politics. For voters who value a leader with "skin in the game"—someone who has real-world stakes and experience in finance—Trump’s economic background is compelling. Unlike many career politicians, he approaches decisions with a business lens, looking at the U.S. economy through profitability, trade advantages, and job creation. Some see this as a key strength, as it allows him to act quickly on economic policies, sometimes bypassing bureaucratic red tape. Others, however, argue that this approach can lead to impulsive or poorly thought-out policies.

2. Media Magnetism and Global Brand Power

Trump’s media-savvy persona and his ability to command attention are undeniable. His background in television, particularly as the star of "The Apprentice," established him as a media figure long before he entered politics, allowing him to cultivate an image that is both widely recognizable and polarizing. Supporters argue that this ability to attract attention on a global scale has helped to "sell" America to the world, potentially even more effectively than previous presidents. By keeping America in the spotlight, Trump can influence international markets, trade, and foreign relations, essentially turning his brand into a type of soft power. Critics, however, claim that this media-driven approach can overshadow substantive policy discussions and sometimes lead to divisive rhetoric.

3. Economic Policies Aimed at Deregulation and Job Growth

Trump’s presidency focused on deregulation, tax cuts, and policies aimed at domestic job growth, particularly in manufacturing and energy. His supporters argue that these moves revitalized certain industries, improved business confidence, and led to lower unemployment rates prior to the pandemic. For example, his corporate tax cuts in 2017 were seen as a significant stimulus for business growth. However, detractors argue that these policies disproportionately benefited the wealthy and that the economic gains did not always translate to long-term prosperity for the average American worker. Despite these criticisms, Trump’s economic strategy appeals to voters who believe in limited government interference in the market.

4. Direct, Unfiltered Communication Style

Trump’s unfiltered communication style sets him apart from typical politicians. His frequent use of social media, especially Twitter, allowed him to speak directly to the public without intermediaries, which many saw as refreshingly transparent. This approach resonated with voters who felt that politicians often say what people want to hear rather than what they believe. Trump's directness is perceived as a way of holding Washington accountable and challenging the status quo. However, critics argue that this approach has led to a polarization of discourse, with a tendency to fuel division rather than promote unity, especially when handling sensitive issues.

5. Strategic Vision Coupled with Unpredictability

Trump’s creativity and willingness to introduce unconventional ideas are both his strength and potential risk. Supporters view him as a non-traditional thinker who’s willing to push boundaries—whether in foreign policy, where he emphasized "America First," or in domestic economic policy. For instance, he took an unprecedented approach to negotiating with North Korea and challenged NATO allies to contribute more, which he argued was in America’s interest. While some voters appreciate his readiness to disrupt norms, others see this as unpredictability that can undermine diplomatic relations or lead to inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy.

To present an evaluation of Kamala Harris’s potential impact as a presidential candidate, let’s dive into five core considerations that highlight both the reasons some might hesitate to support her and why others believe in her abilities:

1. Track Record in Policy and Governance

Kamala Harris has a long record of public service, beginning as a district attorney in San Francisco, followed by serving as California's attorney general, and now as the vice president of the United States. Her career has been marked by several progressive moves, like challenging the banking sector during the 2008 financial crisis and supporting initiatives for police reform. However, her past prosecutorial decisions have drawn criticism. While some argue that her law enforcement background makes her well-suited to lead, others feel her past lacks the visionary qualities needed in a dynamic national leader.

2. Limitations in Creativity and Policy Innovation

Harris is often seen as intelligent and hard-working but lacks the kind of innovative, out-of-the-box thinking that voters may seek in a modern leader. In interviews and public appearances, her responses can feel scripted, and some view her approach as traditional rather than transformative. This is where she might not resonate with voters looking for a forward-thinking, unconventional leader. Observations from interviews like the one on “Club Shay Shay” reveal her tendency to stick to talking points, which some interpret as a sign of limited adaptability in challenging situations Communication Style and Public Perception Effective communication is crucial for any leader, particularly on the world stage. While Harris is often perceived as articulate, her speaking style can sometimes come across as overly cautious or, at times, even condescending. She’s known for a disciplined approach to messaging, which works well in certain situations but may lack the warmth and relatability that help build trust with the public. Some voters may feel she lacks the charisma or spontaneity that connects leaders to everyday people. As observed by commentators, her style may appeal to structured environments but doesn’t always play well in more organic or unexpected settings.

4. Focus on Discipline and Structure

Kamala Harris is known for her strong adherence to structure, which is an asset for roles requiring consistency and regulation. Many believe she brings rigor to tasks and has a no-nonsense approach to work. However, in high-stakes, complex situations that require quick, creative problem-solving, she might not exhibit the flexibility some voters desire. This quality makes her a reliable figure for maintaining the established order, but it may limit her effectiveness in addressing issues that demand innovative, rapid responses. Her demeanor, as you noted, might remind some of a strict disciplinarian—a trait that has its place but doesn’t necessarily suit a role requiring relatability and adaptability.

5. Dedication to Social Justice but Questions on Pragmatic Impact

Harris has long been vocal about social justice and equality issues, aligning herself with causes like affordable healthcare, women’s rights, and criminal justice reform. These efforts resonate with those seeking a candidate dedicated to social equity. Yet some skeptics question her follow-through and the effectiveness of her actions compared to her words. Harris’s position on many social issues is undoubtedly progressive, but the tangible results of her initiatives are sometimes debated. Some critics argue that her approach lacks a clear, actionable path forward that can bridge the gap between her rhetoric and real-world outcomes.

In the current political climate, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump face a close race in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Betting markets and polling show Trump slightly leading, with a 54.7% chance compared to Harris’s 44.4%. In key swing states, Trump has an edge in Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina, while Harris leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Nevada. Both campaigns are pushing hard, as victories in these states could tip the balance. However, with weeks to go, these odds remain volatile and subject to change based on new developments.

For the latest insights on these probabilities, check sources like Newsweek and RealClearPolitics, as they track polling and odds closely​

Newsweek

Photo of Trump vs Kamala by BBC UK